Can you "jump on" with the new 52? Thoughts from a Marvel-minded newbie.

Ever approach someone who is wearing a Batman shirt to talk about Batman, and then they turn out to be as passive a fan as can be? They’ve read Year One and The Dark Knight Returns, both of which they own in trade paperback form, but that’s pretty much it. They probably also have read Watchmen or something, and they think Green Lantern is really cool but haven’t read much Green Lantern (meaning they have never read any Green Lantern and know almost nothing about it).

I’m going to be up front: I am sort of like this person, only I don’t have any Batman shirts and I’m the one approaching you, which makes it worse. You’re here on the 52 Review and you want a DC follower to compare notes with. I am actually of the other ilk, the opposing bloodline, the one sometimes referred to as the “true believers” but who to you I suppose must be no such thing.

Now I do hang out on /co/ sometimes, just like the next guy. I know about all kinds of DC-related things, and have probably seen just as much Power Girl cheesecake as you have. It’s just that to me, DC characters are like pre-Socratic philosophers. I know them mostly from fragmentary descriptions by other people. I wasn’t there.

So along comes this whole relaunch deal and the internet is up in arms, as internets tend to be, and I’m thinking oh, more of this crap.

Then I think, but why not? Maybe this will suck for people who love DC and maybe not, but either way I’m not one of them. Maybe I’ll try it, and see if a born marvelite can jump in and feel welcome.

So here I am to tell you the answer, whether you like it or not.

I am a sucker for moments where guys display how powerful they are by making other guys who are powerful look like total boobs. Pretty much any time where you see some character who you know is a badass get their shit smacked, thus declaring the smacker of the shit even more badass, I’m going to get a big kick out of it.

One of the all time great shit smackings.

So naturally the end of Justice League #1 really did it for me. And you know, I was on board with the majority at first: I didn’t like the new costume designs. But Lee has really made them work here, and based on the last panel of this book, I now think Superman’s the best he’s ever looked. You know what my favorite part is? It’s that turtleneck aspect. It really makes it look like he means business, and when you combine it with “I don’t handle easy,” well, Superman is downright intimidating in this book. Which he should be.

The funny thing is that I was more or less indifferent to the story until this moment at the end. Sure, I said. I get it. Green Lantern is cocky, Batman is more experienced and his sneakiness means he can steal the ring right off that cocky finger. This all made sense, but I didn’t feel compelled. Then Superman happened and suddenly I am compelled. I will definitely be reading Justice League #2.

She is the only one who can
model our new lipstick for albinos.

Batwoman #1 is a story about a lesbian vampire who fights child-snatching ghosts and cigar-smoking zombie CEOs of cosmetics manufacturers. It’s funny how thoroughly I can actually feel that this is what I read while knowing that it isn’t. (Also, that sounds very much like it would be an actual indie comic, so much that I wonder if DC shouldn’t have a few lawyers ready for this one, just in case.)

It hit me when I was transferred to “the lipstick building” how thoroughly this comic was not actually designed to soften my landing.* I wondered in what way I was meant to associate this building with lipstick. Is it a place where lipstick is designed? A place where everybody wears lipstick? Is it, in fact, a building that is designed to look like a giant tube of lipstick? When I realized that my third idea—the one I took the least seriously—appeared to be correct I thought to myself, “Toto, we are not in 616 anymore. Unless the Fantastic Four now live in the Blush Building and I missed that.”

See? Vampire.

Accessibility just wasn’t the goal here, and as I understand it that’s thrilling to people who read pre-relaunch Batwoman. That makes much more sense to me than the book itself does. Even the art, which is undeniably beautiful, is not welcoming from a reading point of view. I’m not a fan of “creative” panel layouts and regular use of double-page spreads, but it’s apparent that Williams, as a comic book artist, puts a great deal more emphasis on “artist” than “comic book.”

As obtuse as I find it, I’m happy for the fans this book was obviously written for. I will not be reading Batwoman #2.

*The editor has informed me that the lipstick building is a real entity. Who knew! Apparently not me. Now I'm even more amused at my reinterpretation.

Not what's happening to Clark,
despite that he's unmarried.

As a Spider-Man junkie, I’m pretty miffed about the upcoming reboot movie. It’s not the fact that it’s a reboot, or because the guy they picked to play teenage Peter is a 30-year-old giraffe. It’s because they’re retelling Spider-Man’s origin story, which everybody already knows. I don’t want to sit through it again.

If Action Comics #1 had started with the story of how Kal-El was ejected from a dying Krypton and landed in Smallville where he was raised by the Kents, I’d have been similarly annoyed. I watched the Superman animated movie when I was a kid, so I know all this.

Instead I’m reading about a Superman I’ve never seen before, and that rules. Now, Superman has never drawn me in the way my favorite cape characters have, but I’ve come to understand his strengths as a character much better in the last couple years and I do know well enough what he’s like. I’m not sure I know anything at all about this Superman, though.

This Superman is young and inexperienced, and he can’t fly. He actually gave me little Spidey smiles a couple times. I’ve never thought of Superman as having much of a sense of humor about what he does, but here he is yelling “catch me if you can!” while he gleefully outruns police cars. When asked by a girl if he can really jump the Metropolis Tower, he says, “Never tried from here,” and he’s grinning despite just having been blasted by a tank.

The fact that he’s not completely invulnerable and can’t fly yet, and that he seems like his powers are still fresh and thrilling to him, give him a little touch of that famous Spider-Man “relatability” that first turned me into such a frothing marvelite as a kid. I want to know more about this guy.

I don't understand how someone
looked at this and said,"Let's make
 a super hero based on that!"

You know, I finished off Green Lantern and I couldn’t help thinking maybe I shouldn’ t let Batwoman get away with its excuse after all, because this is how it’s done.

I have a hard time accepting Green Lantern because lanterns are a pretty terrible theme for a super hero. I’ve always wondered why they didn’t just call him Green Ring. But I easily managed to enjoy this book. It was actually nice that I was jumping into an established storyline because I could immediately tell that every major interaction between the characters had a lot of history behind it.

Johns did a brilliant job of letting me know that history existed without making me feel bewildered for having missed it. From just this issue, I’ve already gathered Hal’s history and behavior as a Green Lantern, Sinestro’s turncoat nature, and the nature of Hal’s relationship troubles with Carol (they’re the same as his troubles with being a Green Lantern.) And none of these things were revealed to me through lengthy exposition, either in dialogue or narration. They all emerged naturally through dialogue that made sense. That’s a sign of really great writing.

Just a basic strangling? Justice League did a
better job of showing off GL's powers than GL #1!

The one thing that this was lacking was action. Action Comics... well, you’d think this would have to be the case from the name, but at any rate Action Comics got me hooked on a character I’m only a little familiar with by giving him a lot of personality, but also by showing me just how exciting it could be to watch him doing his thing. I didn’t get that from Green Lantern. I’ll be checking out the next issue for sure, but it will have to do more to gets is hooks in me permanently.

I have things to say about Mr. Terrific that I think are going to be funny.

But first, let me get something straight here. I don’t want anybody to read this as a declaration of superiority. I just can’t help myself.

Mr. Terrific? More like Mr. Not-as-Fantastic!

Okay, stay with me here. Let’s keep in mind that Mr. Terrific boasts, in this comic, about being the third smartest man in the world (the humor of that is pointed out by another character, but I’m honestly not sure if the author understood what he was doing there). It’s well known back home in little ol’ 616 that Mr. Fantastic is the smartest man in the world. So if the two were pitted against each other in a battle of superfluity, Fantastic would just stretch his neck out, look the guy over for a moment, and wonder why DC was insulting him by sending over their third-tier Mr. Adjective Guy. Don’t they have a Mr. Super-Duper or something?

Mr. Terrific would probably respond by attempting to reverse the polarity of the gravity waves of his positively and negatively charged nuclear ion pulsar floopy doops. In like, the fifth dimension, or something.

I will not be reading Mr. Terrific #2, but I am eagerly awaiting hilarious screencaps from it.

Batman and Robin has been reborn in the new 52 as a reinterpretation of the classic Joel Schumacher film, Batman & Robin. This issue takes inspiration from the film’s plot, as it features a weathered father figure attempting to discipline his younger and rasher pupil—who in turn feels underappreciated and demands to be treated as a partner.

That was probably mean of me, and nobody involved in making this book really deserved it, but I’m just plain sick of this tired old master-student plot. I suppose you could argue this is different because Batman is literally Robin’s father this time, but I’m not sure what functional difference it makes.

“I’m light years ahead of all the past Robins!” Damien shrieks like the wretched little creature he is. He is also far more annoying. I don’t know why there are still people who haven’t realized that snotty little kids never make interesting characters, because if you make them any more complex than that they either stop being believable or step into Glass family genius territory.

But I can be forgiving, and it’s possible I’m still being too harsh, because after all they probably did this for me. I’m the new guy here and it’s only by chance that I already know who Damien is. I suppose, as a new #1, Tomasi felt this issue had to introduce us to the Batman/Robin dynamic, and that’s fair. I just happen to hate it.

I mentioned in the beginning that there is a punchline to all this, and I think the time has come to strike. Not perhaps the easiest one for me to deliver, because as it turns out I’m punching myself.

I’ve always had the sense that it’s stupid when companies want to do relaunches in order to make new readers feel welcome and comfortable. If you really want to jump in, I’ve always said, you can pick up anywhere and use Wikipedia for people and things you don’t understand. Often you don’t even need to do that, because as issues go on you’ll figure it all out from context.

I am now in the awkward position of confessing that Marvel and DC may understand this issue far better than I do. (My impression is that a reader is not supposed to do that concerning any subject, ever, especially not on the internet.) But I still don’t know why an evil skeleton man would be sending agents after Batwoman in a giant tube of lipstick, and the Wikipedia button on my bookmarks bar has been staring at me the whole time I’ve been writing this.

Dare I close with a... with uh... well, I’ll try it out and you can hate me if you want: ‘nuff said.

By T.K. Tunstal with 4 comments

New 52 Review: Batman Detective Comics #1

Here it is! The title that named the company! Detective Comics #1! After 881 issues spanning 74 years (The longest continually published comic book in America), we get a fresh new start!

And boy, what a mediocre start it is.

It starts with Batman hot on the trail of The Joker, which is a perfect way to start any new Batman story arch. That much is good. What's confusing is when exactly this is supposed to be taking place. Right off the bat (Excuse the pun) we're left wondering, at what point in Batman's career is this supposed to be taking place? It could be the beginning, but he claims he’s been active in Gotham for years. He’s already allied with a young Commissioner Gordon, but the rest of the police force has been ordered by the mayor to shoot him on site. There’s even a vague reference to Catwoman. Not to mention all of his former sidekicks running around the rest of the DCnU. Unlike Superman in Action Comics, there is really no clear indication that this is a revamp of Batman’s earlier career. It just jumps right into how long he’s been chasing after The Joker.

The main problem with this is that it immediately assumes you are familiar with all the characters and jumps right into the action. Granted, it’s Batman. If you’ve even heard of comic books you know who Batman is. Still, it’s confusing and doesn’t make for a good "jumping on point for new readers", which was the entire purpose for the reboot in the first place.

Also, Batman just doesn’t seem to be…well, Batman. The Joker has been active for six years and Batman is only now finally able to find him. That’s bush league, Bats! Bush league! He also utilizes robot bat cameras called "Ro-Bats".

…Really? "Ro-Bats"? We're getting into Brave and the Bold/Adam West territory here, people!

The Joker doesn’t seem like The Joker either. After six years his body count is only one hundred and fourteen? Amateurish! Sure, in real-life statistics that’s a lot, but I’ve seen Joker top that in a single issue! Also, where’s the animosity between him and Batman? There is none! They’ve apparently never even met before the events of this issue. Joker’s origin of falling into a vat of chemicals while fleeing the Batman, a solid comic book fact for sixty years, has seemingly never happened. Joker’s just some psycho who doesn’t even care about Batman. That is a huge disappointment! A massive part of the excitement in Batman comics is the Batman/Joker rivalry. Why did they get rid of that? It should be expected, especially if we are expected to already be familiar the characters.

The worst part is the ending. As Joker sits defeated in Arkham Asylum, its revealed that it was all part of his master plan to get his face cut off and removed by a mysterious shadowy figure so that he can be “reborn”. Now I like a good Nicholas Cage/John Travolta movie as much as the next guy, but, seriously, why? This just seems to be for shock value alone and completely unnecessary! If they’re going to use The Joker, why drastically change him right after the first issue? I find it hard to believe that anything they do to him will be nearly as good as just having the Joker, the classic comic book icon, just run amok in Gotham. After all, if it’s not broke, don’t fix it!

It's like they've taken these well known, beloved characters and watered them down to be more "realistic" and/or "modern". It's the same "Ultimate Marvel" shenanigans I was afraid they'd pull ever since I first heard about the reboot!

I will say this though. Tony Salvador Daniel is a very talented artist. His representation of the characters is very good. I especially like how he draws The Joker. I’m not sure if I like Batman’s new complicated, plated armor, but Daniel does it well nonetheless. The problem is his action seems all over the place in some scenes. The action can be a little confusing and hard to follow when you put an entire helicopter chase scene into five panels on a single page. The action in the book was pretty decent over all, but at the very least I think Daniel needs to work on his pacing.

Or at least explain how Joker learned the Mortal Kombat move "Teleportaion-bite-to-the-jugular"!

There was one moment, however. One moment that defined this version of the Batman character so well and made it all worthwhile. At the very beginning Batman claims he is feeling lucky (Supposedly meaning about his chances of finally catching The Joker), but after The Joker escapes in a fiery explosion Batman barely hears a young girl cry out for help an instant before he is about to chase the fleeing maniac. A murdering madman escapes, one person lies dead after being brutally stabbed, and the building is in flames, but as Batman reaches out to save one little girl, he sums up the situation in one word: “Lucky”. YES! That is the line between vigilante and hero! That IS Batman! As long as Tony S. Daniel knows that, there IS hope for this book!

Of course, the little girl later turns out to be part of a convoluted trap that kills a bunch of police officers, but still, that one moment! Solid gold!

That’s all for now! Until next time: Don’t take life too seriously; you’ll never get out of it alive!

By The Chad with 2 comments